I would love for this to win, but I'm afraid that certain ("flashier"? "crowd-favorite"?) entries will cause a kind of bias to the election. When future contests are held, imagine having MORE THAN A SINGLE VOTE to spend! Maybe if you could vote for 4 or 5 entries, perhaps with a sequential-preference-grade (Rank#1-most favorite, Rank#2-next favorite, etc).
I wish that more entries like this one could have a more honest chance of succeeding. And rightfully so, because here's an example: A crowd-favorite image takes a whopping 40% of the vote as Rank#1. However, a less-flashier entry scores quite well with 65% voting it as Rank#4. Those kinds of numbers give a better breakdown/overview of how pieces are actually received by viewers, and give them an actual, well-deserved shot at being a contender. But without something other than a Winner-Takes-All ruling, some of the "actually-favored" pieces will slip through the cracks without receiving a single vote (even when truthfully it might've had the support of 65% of voters).
Por favor faça seu login para deixar um comentário!
Hi Lukasz.
1. Please include the "." (dot) in the word "Freely.". The Tag line is part of our Branding , so needs to be exact.
Tim.
@Tim Jones Corrected. Thank you for the hint.
Thanks Lukasz :-)
Good work!
Thanks erlangparasu :)
This really is superb. Every inch is just immaculate. Perfection.
I would love for this to win, but I'm afraid that certain ("flashier"? "crowd-favorite"?) entries will cause a kind of bias to the election. When future contests are held, imagine having MORE THAN A SINGLE VOTE to spend! Maybe if you could vote for 4 or 5 entries, perhaps with a sequential-preference-grade (Rank#1-most favorite, Rank#2-next favorite, etc).
I wish that more entries like this one could have a more honest chance of succeeding. And rightfully so, because here's an example: A crowd-favorite image takes a whopping 40% of the vote as Rank#1. However, a less-flashier entry scores quite well with 65% voting it as Rank#4. Those kinds of numbers give a better breakdown/overview of how pieces are actually received by viewers, and give them an actual, well-deserved shot at being a contender. But without something other than a Winner-Takes-All ruling, some of the "actually-favored" pieces will slip through the cracks without receiving a single vote (even when truthfully it might've had the support of 65% of voters).