Inkscape.org
Beginners' Questions [1.4] LPE boolean operation?
  1. #1
    Freezr Freezr @freezr

    Hi guys,

    did I missed anything? 🤷‍

    How can I create an LPE boolean effect with Inkscape 1.4 if I can't select more than two shapes at the time? 🤷‍

    Very confused... 🤔

    Thanks... 🙏

     

     

  2. #2
    Paddy_CAD Paddy_CAD @Paddy_CAD

    Add the path effect once more for each additional shape. This example combines three shapes.

  3. #3
    Freezr Freezr @freezr
    *

    Hi @Paddy_CAD thanks...

    Maybe I am doing the steps wrongly, this is what I understood:

    1. Create a path or an object
    2. Apply the LPE "Boolean operation"
    3. Create a second path or a second object
    4. Apply the LPE "Boolean operation" to the second shape
    5. Overlap shape 1 and shape 2
    6. See the effect

    Those steps do not produce any result on my end.

    🤷

     

    Can you share your file so I can inspect it?

    Thanks... 🙏

     

  4. #4
    COD COD @COD

    Similar concept:

    Intersecting A Pattern Filled Object
  5. #5
    Paddy_CAD Paddy_CAD @Paddy_CAD

    I already shared my file. Download the image from #2 above.

    Draw three shapes: A, B and C
    Select and copy shape B.
    Select shape A. Apply the boolean LPE and [Link to shape].
    Select and copy shape C.
    Select shape A. Apply the boolean LPE again and [Link to shape].

  6. #6
    David248 David248 @David248
    *
    COD

    Similar concept:

    Wow ! works like a charm on complex patterns with many colors : a good alternative to multiple boolean operations extension (wonky, to me). The ingredients for a future "pattern > flatten" ? 

     

     

  7. #7
    COD COD @COD

    Something has definitely improved in v1.4.2.  It was very difficult to do that in 1.3.2. I would end up with artifacts outside of the cutting object that I would have to break apart and delete. If I broke it apart then everything would go black fill. 

    Yes indeed - you can intersect complex objects with different colors now. Maybe we are very close to a simple "Pattern>Flatten"?