Hi! I want to do 'flatten' @3d/psr-b1919-21#chart">this svg based on a visualization by Harold Craft and brought to popularity by Joy Division. The steps I followed were: - Remove all irrelevant groups - Remove the stroke for all paths, leaving only fill - Select everything and click on Path>Flatten
When the program is done processing everything, I then remove the fill and give stroke to the newly created paths, and I discover that new connections have been created through the 'endpoints' of the previous open paths, making them closed. Is this intended? Is there an easy way to 'open up' those shapes? If I do Path>Flatten with stroke and not fill, the connection is not created, but the stroke is expanded like if I had clicked path>stroke to path, which I don't want.
Hi!
I want to do 'flatten' @3d/psr-b1919-21#chart">this svg based on a visualization by Harold Craft and brought to popularity by Joy Division.
The steps I followed were:
- Remove all irrelevant groups
- Remove the stroke for all paths, leaving only fill
- Select everything and click on Path>Flatten
When the program is done processing everything, I then remove the fill and give stroke to the newly created paths, and I discover that new connections have been created through the 'endpoints' of the previous open paths, making them closed. Is this intended? Is there an easy way to 'open up' those shapes?
If I do Path>Flatten with stroke and not fill, the connection is not created, but the stroke is expanded like if I had clicked path>stroke to path, which I don't want.
If you put in the link again you´ll be banned.
Sorry, where appears the prohibition against links? I couldn't find it in the Code of Conduct and your comment came across to me as rude.
Please attach the svg to a reply using the paperclip button. That will be more direct.
I want to flatten something like this, but instead of having 2 'mountain lines', I have 80
ok I get the idea. You want to "flatten" the entire chart.
But when you state "flatten", we need more clarity... Do you want to create :
or something else entirely?
Is this for laser cutting/engraving or other CNC?
BTW, this has been vectorized already here, but it's maybe more complex than the version you hope to create.
Perhaps like so:
Fun to play with the file linked in my post above
@Asmatzaile
Ok, I think I have a viable workflow.
Here is the result of my test:
Can be done... takes about an hour using the shortcuts described above.