Having tried to save a simple .SVG-version of my artwork, the light exposure becomes extreme, when uploaded/HTML-rendered - cf attached

{over-exposure occurs in Chrome, Edge and Opera }

Debugging: Wondered if the background color and/or blend-mode were the cause, but that only worked partially (still way too much exposure on regular 'Normal' blended layers)

Not sure if you use the default transparency background color, because blend modes won´t work in this case.

ok, no ... as I am pursuing a 'normal exposure', I only tried to debug; by use of altering to different blend-modes (to check if any changes)

btw: here is the html-code

<img rel="icon" type="data:image/svg+xml" src="https://www.amfibios.dk/WeSe/img/P25/25P_org_c1.svg" decoding="async" style="width:100%;height:100%;" data-file-width="16" data-file-height="16" fill: white;>

Tried chaing fill to 'black', and googling "html browsers svg scripting" gives me knowledge like: 

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Scripting

https://www.w3schools.com/html/html5_svg.asp

https://sodocumentation.net/svg/topic/5021/scripting

- which doesn't help me either :-/

Depending on your application, it may be useful to bitmap the objects (Alt+B, remove original) prior to final output. The ability of renderers to display filtered objects is variable.

Compare the original to the bitmapped version.

(I also cleaned the doc.)

Ok, thanks Tyler, ... but the whole reason for me to use InkScape is actually to use the vector-effect (in case of websource is opened on 4 or 8K I want to avoid bitmap blur)

Understand that the effects are variable (in the sense that one can export, the effects as bitmap only - if one wants the correct 1-to-1 rendering)

[SOLVED]

Given the variability of renderers for filters, one might recreate the design using gradients to achieve a similar look, and keep all the artwork as vector.